On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Aditya Kali <adityak...@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Aditya Kali <adityak...@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Aditya Kali <adityak...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Aditya Kali <adityak...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> if (opts->flags & CGRP_ROOT_SANE_BEHAVIOR) {
>>>>>>> pr_warn("sane_behavior: this is still under development
>>>>>>> and its behaviors will change, proceed at your own risk\n");
>>>>>>> - if (nr_opts != 1) {
>>>>>>> + if (nr_opts > 1) {
>>>>>>> pr_err("sane_behavior: no other mount options
>>>>>>> allowed\n");
>>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This looks wrong. But, if you make the change above, then it'll be
>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It would have been nice if simple 'mount -t cgroup cgroup <mnt>' from
>>>>> cgroupns does the right thing automatically.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a debatable point, but it's not what I meant. Won't your code
>>>> let 'mount -t cgroup -o one_evil_flag cgroup mountpoint' through?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think so. This check "if (nr_opts > 1)" is nested under "if
>>> (opts->flags & CGRP_ROOT_SANE_BEHAVIOR)". So we know that there is
>>> atleast 1 option ('__DEVEL__sane_behavior') present (implicit or not).
>>> Addition of 'one_evil_flag' will make nr_opts = 2 and result in EINVAL
>>> here.
>>
>> But the implicit __DEVEL__sane_behavior doesn't increment nr_opts, right?
>>
>
> Yes. Hence this change makes sure that we don't return EINVAL when
> nr_opts == 0 or nr_opts == 1 :)
> That way, both of the following are equivalent when inside non-init cgroupns:
>
> (1) $ mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior cgroup mountpoint
> (2) $ mount -t cgroup cgroup mountpoint
>
> Any other mount option will trigger the error here.
I still don't get it. Can you walk me through why mount -o
some_other_option -t cgroup cgroup mountpoint causes -EINVAL?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
