> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com] > > > > If this is the case, I suggest you update patch 8187/1 to retain the > > byte_rev_table symbol, even in the accelerated case, and remove it > > with a followup patch once Joe's patches have landed upstream. Also, a > > link to the patches would be nice, and perhaps a bit of explanation > > how/when they are expected to be merged. > > Indeed, or instead put together a series with the appropriate acks so > somebody can merge it all in one go. Merging this on a piecemeal basis is > going to cause breakages (as you pointed out). > > Will
Hi Will, Could I add you as ack-by , and submit these 2 patches into the Patch system ? So you can merge them together . Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
