> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 5:01 PM
> To: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Kani, Toshimitsu; Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] x86, mm, pat: Add pgprot_writethrough() for
> WT
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> wrote:
...
> On the other hand, I thought that _GPL was supposed to be more about
> whether the thing using it is inherently a derived work of the Linux
> kernel. Since WT is an Intel concept, not a Linux concept, then I
> think that this is a hard argument to make.
IBM System/360 Model 85 (1968) had write-through (i.e., store-through)
caching. Intel might claim Write Combining, though.
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
