Hi!

> Commit-ID:  36df04bc5273a046f53b5e359febc1225f85aa7b
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/36df04bc5273a046f53b5e359febc1225f85aa7b
> Author:     Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:21:57 +0100
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 07:17:45 +0100
> 
> sched/wait: Reimplement wait_event_freezable()
> 
> Provide better implementations of wait_event_freezable() APIs.
> 
> The problem is with freezer_do_not_count(), it hides the thread from
> the freezer, even though this thread might not actually freeze/sleep
> at all.

Can you elaborate?

The thread will be in freezer_do_not_count() area, but it is just
waiting for event there, it should not do much damage.

If this is bugfix, should it be cc-ed to stable?

Did you test it with suspend/hibernation? Because I can't really see
how it works.

> +#define __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition)                                
> \
> +     ___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0,          \
> +                         schedule(); try_to_freeze())
> +

_Three_ underscores. And two underscore version exists, too,
fortunately it at least has different number of arguments.
                                                                        Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to