ndo_gso_check() was recently introduced to allow NICs to report the
offloading support that they have on a per-skb basis. Add an
implementation for this driver which checks for something that looks
like VXLAN.

Implementation shamelessly stolen from Tom Herbert:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/332428/focus=333111

Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
---
Should this driver report support for GSO on packets with tunnel headers
up to 64B like the i40e driver does?
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_netdev.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_netdev.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_netdev.c
index 8811364..b9ef622 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_netdev.c
@@ -1350,6 +1350,17 @@ static void fm10k_dfwd_del_station(struct net_device 
*dev, void *priv)
        }
 }
 
+static bool fm10k_gso_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
+{
+       if ((skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL) &&
+           (skb->inner_protocol_type != ENCAP_TYPE_ETHER ||
+            skb->inner_protocol != htons(ETH_P_TEB) ||
+            skb_inner_mac_header(skb) - skb_transport_header(skb) != 16))
+               return false;
+
+       return true;
+}
+
 static const struct net_device_ops fm10k_netdev_ops = {
        .ndo_open               = fm10k_open,
        .ndo_stop               = fm10k_close,
@@ -1372,6 +1383,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops fm10k_netdev_ops = {
        .ndo_do_ioctl           = fm10k_ioctl,
        .ndo_dfwd_add_station   = fm10k_dfwd_add_station,
        .ndo_dfwd_del_station   = fm10k_dfwd_del_station,
+       .ndo_gso_check          = fm10k_gso_check,
 };
 
 #define DEFAULT_DEBUG_LEVEL_SHIFT 3
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to