Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': > >> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function > >> 'acpi_boot_table_init' > >> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function > >> 'acpi_boot_init' > > > > > > > > diff -puN include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix include/linux/acpi.h > > --- 25/include/linux/acpi.h~no-acpi-build-fix 2005-04-05 > > 00:14:46.000000000 -0700 > > +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/acpi.h 2005-04-05 00:23:39.000000000 -0700 > > @@ -418,16 +418,6 @@ extern int sbf_port ; > [patch snipped] > > Yes, that worked with no CONFIG_ACPI. Thanks.
OK, I'll keep spamming the acpi guys with it until they tell me to shut up. > On a slightly offtopic note, I'm now using this gcc: > gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050308 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.32) > > I don't have any quantitative data at hand, this seems SLOOOOW. > I guess that's progress. But it slows down testing somewhat. > There's a reason why I persist in keeping the kernel working with gcc-2.95.4! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
