On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:03:51 +0100 Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi Oded, Jesse, > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:33:38AM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > I tested our amdkfd driver with your patches applied (kernel 3.17.1). > > I run OpenCL tests, Aparapi/Sumatra (Java) and OpenMP > > > > All tests passed and I didn't see any kernel error messages. > > > > So: > > > > Tested-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gab...@amd.com> > > Thanks for testing Oded. Jesse, the patch looks good to me, except the > task accounting for the page-faults. I'd like to get rid of using > task_struct in the IOMMUv2 driver entirely if possible. Also it is not > really the CPU task causing the faults, but some non-CPU process. Hm, but the CPU task initiates the activity on the GPU, so we should account for it somewhere, right? I guess I had been thinking of the "task" as spanning the CPUs and GPUs and other devices in the system, rather than just representing the CPU activity. > So can you please remove that code and resend the patches with Oded's > Tested-by and Andrew Morton on Cc? I think these patches should go > through the -mm tree. Sure, thanks. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
