Ben Castricum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Ben Castricum wrote: > > > ... > > > CC fs/quota_v2.o > > > fs/quota_v2.c: In function `v2_write_dquot': > > > fs/quota_v2.c:399: warning: unknown conversion type character `z' in > > > format > > > fs/quota_v2.c:399: warning: too many arguments for format > > > > These are warnings that only occur with gcc 2.95 and that can safely be > > ignored. > > Just wondering, isn't 2.95.3 the recommended compiler anymore? I only use > this (a bit old) version because it's _the_ compiler for the kernel. > > If it still is then I find it a bit strange that code is accepted that > doesn't compile cleanly on the recommended compiler. >
gcc-2.95.x requires %Z, not %z. The latter is more correct, and not many people use gcc-2.95.x, so we'll just have to live with the warnings, I'm afraid. I patched my gcc-2.95.4 to understand %z, but seem to have not put the patch anywhere where I can find it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
