Hi, On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > Why is this choice needed at all? Why would one choose SPARSEMEM over > > DISCONTIGMEM? > > For now, it's only so people can test either one, and we don't have to > try to toss DICONTIGMEM out of the kernel in fell swoop. When the > memory hotplug options are enabled, the DISCONTIG option goes away, and > SPARSEMEM is selected as the only option. > > I hope to, in the future, make the options more like this: > > config MEMORY_HOTPLUG... > config NUMA... > > config DISCONTIGMEM > depends on NUMA && !MEMORY_HOTPLUG > > config SPARSEMEM > depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG || OTHER_ARCH_THING > > config FLATMEM > depends on !DISCONTIGMEM && !SPARSEMEM I was hoping for this too, in the meantime can't you simply make it a suboption of DISCONTIGMEM? So an extra option is only visible when it's enabled and most people can ignore it completely by just disabling a single option. > > Help texts such as "If unsure, choose <something else>" make > > the complete config option pretty useless. > > They don't make it useless, they just guide a clueless user to the right > place, without them having to think about it at all. Those of us that > need to test the various configurations are quite sure of what we're > doing, and can ignore the messages. :) > > I'm not opposed to creating some better help text for those things, I'm > just not sure that we really need it, or that it will help end users get > to the right place. I guess more explanation never hurt anyone. Some basic explanation with a link for more information can't hurt. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/