On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:39:07PM +0100, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote: > Hello Riku and Charles, > > I tried this with my original patch and the suggested patch applied, > this seems to work for me too. > > One thing that bothers me, is the suspend / resume situation; usbnet.c > seems to call the bind( ) on probe( ). Suspend / resume do not seem to > call bind( ) directly. > > As Riku pointed out, the original patch I reverted was because of > suspend/resume issues. I wonder if this will still work?
I seem to remember I had a few issues with Arndale suspend and resume last time I tried it anyways, so not sure I will be able to test for that. But I will have a go. But in either case I guess a fix for that is probably orthogonal to my suggested fix here, as it looks pretty clear we intended to fully reset the device in bind and were appartently not doing that. So this patch is probably a needed fix anyway. Even if there are seperate issues relating to suspend and resume. Thanks, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
