blk-mq is using preempt_disable/enable in order to ensure that the
queue runners are placed on the right CPU.  This does not work with
the RT patches, because __blk_mq_run_hw_queue takes a non-raw
spinlock with the preemption-disabled region.  If there is contention
on the lock, this violates the rules for preemption-disabled regions.

While this should be easily fixable within the RT patches just by doing
migrate_disable/enable, we can do better and document _why_ this
particular region runs with disabled preemption.  After the previous
patch, it is trivial to switch it to get/put_cpu; the RT patches then
can change it to get_cpu_light, which lets virtio-blk run under RT
kernels.

Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Clark Williams <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Clark Williams <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index c6192ba78950..a958851d9dd2 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -829,14 +829,14 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool 
async)
                return;
 
        if (!async) {
-               preempt_disable();
-               if (cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask)) {
+               int cpu = get_cpu();
+               if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask)) {
                        __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
-                       preempt_enable();
+                       put_cpu();
                        return;
                }
 
-               preempt_enable();
+               put_cpu();
        }
 
        if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to