> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:54:17AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote: > > Yan, Zheng (13): > > perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size > > perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback > > perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack > > perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support > > perf, core: pmu specific data for perf task context > > perf, core: always switch pmu specific data during context switch > > perf, x86: allocate space for storing LBR stack > > perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack > > perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch > > perf, core: simplify need branch stack check > > perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS > > perf, x86: disable FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI when LBR operates in callstack > > mode > > perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack > > > > Peter Zijlstra (Intel) (1): > > perf, x86: expose LBR callstack to user space tool > > So are these the exact same patches I already had, or did you change > anything else? Its not immediately clear, lemme try and figure out.
Yes, Zheng's patches are exact same patches as you already had. I only remove 11, 13,16, 17 from previous patch set and add your new patch (no change). The significant changes are in user tool part, I sent them out as a separate patch set. Thanks, Kan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
