On 29 October 2014 15:22, Matt Fleming <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct, at 08:48:23PM, Mathias Krause wrote: >> On 28 October 2014 19:57, Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: >> > [...] >> > >> > Ok, thanks for refreshing this for me, your patch is good, so >> > >> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> >> >> Thanks. But as you said, the EFI mappings shouldn't be in the kernel's >> page table in the first place, so I'd rather see a patch doing that >> instead. But, in the meantime, this patch is valid, as it shows the >> "status quo". > > Now, everyone agrees this patch is OK? There are no comments that still > need addressing?
Matt, do you mind to take this patch (and only this patch) through the EFI tree? There were objections to patch 2 and 3 of this series from the x86 folks so I won't re-do those. Regards, Mathias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
