3.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chris Mason <c...@fb.com>

commit 6e5aafb27419f32575b27ef9d6a31e5d54661aca upstream.

If we hit any errors in btrfs_lookup_csums_range, we'll loop through all
the csums we allocate and free them.  But the code was using list_entry
incorrectly, and ended up trying to free the on-stack list_head instead.

This bug came from commit 0678b6185

btrfs: Don't BUG_ON kzalloc error in btrfs_lookup_csums_range()

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <c...@fb.com>
Reported-by: Erik Berg <bt...@slipsprogrammoer.no>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/file-item.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrf
        ret = 0;
 fail:
        while (ret < 0 && !list_empty(&tmplist)) {
-               sums = list_entry(&tmplist, struct btrfs_ordered_sum, list);
+               sums = list_entry(tmplist.next, struct btrfs_ordered_sum, list);
                list_del(&sums->list);
                kfree(sums);
        }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to