On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:58:05AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
SNIP
> };
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 2f9e680..8c23607 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -537,13 +537,24 @@ int perf_evsel__group_desc(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> char *buf, size_t size)
> }
>
> static void
> -perf_evsel__config_callgraph(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> +perf_evsel__config_callgraph(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> + struct record_opts *opts)
> {
> bool function = perf_evsel__is_function_event(evsel);
> struct perf_event_attr *attr = &evsel->attr;
>
> perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, CALLCHAIN);
>
> + if (callchain_param.record_mode == CALLCHAIN_LBR) {
> + if (!opts->branch_stack) {
> + perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
> + attr->branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER |
> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK;
> + attr->exclude_user = 0;
I think we shouldn't siletly change attr->exclude_user,
if it was defined, we need to display warning that
we are changing that or fail
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
