>>>> + goto cleanup1; >>> >>> 1) Don't use GW-BASIC label names. Label names should reflect what the >>> label does such as free_fuse_word or free_fuse_tabel. >>> >>> 2) Don't use do-nothing labels. Just return directly. >> >> Does the document "CodingStyle" need any extensions for special cases? > > I don't understand.
Should the naming convention become more explicit for jump labels? > CodingStyle says: > > "If there is no cleanup needed then just return directly." Do you want that I send another update suggestion with other corrections for jump labels in the affected function implementation? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
