On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:24:42PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >[...] > >>>On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:26:31PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > >> > >>Hi Adrian, > > > >Hi Paolo, > > Paulo, please :) >...
The second name I got wrong today... Sorry. >... > >Joerg's list of recursions should be valid independent of the kernel > >version. Fixing any real stack problems [1] that might be in this list > >is a valuable task. > > > >And "make checkstack" in a kernel compiled with unit-at-a-time lists > >several possible problems at the top. > > Ok, I've read Jörn's mail also and I think I can help out. It seems > however that there are more people working on this. Will it be better to > coordinate so we don't duplicate efforts or is the "everyone looks at > everything" approach better, so that its harder to miss something? The only other person that seemed very interested n stack issues was Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. You could coordinate with him, but in the end it should be possible to have a first set of patches ready a few hours or even minutes after you started, so duplicate efforts would require a very unlucky timing. > Paulo Marques cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/