On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:14:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:20PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > +static int remove_loops(struct branch_entry *l, int nr)
> > +{
> > + int i, j, off;
> > + unsigned char chash[CHASHSZ];
> > +
> > + memset(chash, NO_ENTRY, sizeof(chash));
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(nr >= 256);
>
> What is wrong with return -1 and propagating the error, so that the user
> is informed if the data being processed is bogus, stop processing with a
> warning or continue processing if finding the next valid record is
> possible?
The error doesn't depend on the record. There is a check for the record
being < 127 in front of this. This is merely to catch that
if someone increases PERF_MAX_BRANCH_DEPTH to below 255 they need
to increase the type of the hash table from u8.
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
