On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 21:42:12 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> Printing a single character to a seqfile might as well be done with > seq_putc instead of seq_puts; this avoids a strlen() call and a memory > access. It also shaves another few bytes off the generated code. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > --- > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 +- > kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 4 ++-- > kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 4 ++-- > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 10 +++++----- > kernel/trace/trace_printk.c | 2 +- > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 4 ++-- > 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > index 7890718..9ffd006 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > @@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@ static int t_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > } > } > > - seq_puts(m, "\n"); > + seq_putc(m, '\n'); Ah, you did it here. Well, it is fine to have it in the first patch anyway. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
