pte_protnone_numa is only safe to use after VMA checks for PROT_NONE are
complete. Treating a real PROT_NONE PTE as a NUMA hinting fault is going
to result in strangeness so add a check for it. BUG_ON looks like overkill
but if this is hit then it's a serious bug that could result in corruption
so do not even try recovering. It would have been more comprehensive to
check VMA flags in pte_protnone_numa but it would have made the API ugly
just for a debugging check.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +++
 mm/memory.c      | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 4f02010..ae3f3e0 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1274,6 +1274,9 @@ int do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct 
vm_area_struct *vma,
        bool migrated = false;
        int flags = 0;
 
+       /* A PROT_NONE fault should not end up here */
+       BUG_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE)));
+
        ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmdp);
        if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmd, *pmdp)))
                goto out_unlock;
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 360c3e3..5d45026 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3116,6 +3116,9 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct 
vm_area_struct *vma,
        bool migrated = false;
        int flags = 0;
 
+       /* A PROT_NONE fault should not end up here */
+       BUG_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE)));
+
        /*
        * The "pte" at this point cannot be used safely without
        * validation through pte_unmap_same(). It's of NUMA type but
-- 
1.8.4.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to