On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >> So what I suppose to do with my patch? If it does not work could
> >> anyone provide patch that removes ARM arch dependency from
> >> tegra20_timer.c?
> >
> > Huch? You want other people to solve your problems?
>
> This is not the point. I provided patch that fixes the issue. Other
> people said that they have ideas how to do it different (and better)
> way. So I am asking to share these ideas represented as a patch.
That's not the way it works.
You sent a patch to solve an problem which you are facing.
Now the people who review the patch think that there is a better
approach than moving code from arm/ to the timekeeping core code.
So it's up to you to come up with a patch which solves the problem in
the right way.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
