On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Fabian Frederick <f...@skynet.be> wrote: > > Thomas talked about csd_lock and the last reliable stack function > being smp_call_function_single, I thought it could be interesting > to bisect directly in smp.c as I only read about reverting mm/memory.c > stuff ... Maybe not too much original but who knows ? :)
Fair enough. I'd be almost have been more inclined to look at the apic changes, like commit 4ba2968420fa ("percpu: Resolve ambiguities in __get_cpu_var/cpumask_var_t") that was horribly buggy. It was fixed in 59f6e2073c72, though, and the end result looks sane, so I don't think it's that particular thing. The rest seems to be either kvm-related or just clearly trivial. Which is why I think even a partial bisection would be nice - as it is we're kind of just guessing, and I'm not all the confident in the guesses. Sure, they may be right, but bisection is guaranteed to at least narrow the suspects down, while guesses *could* hit jack-pot, but could also be a total waste of time. I guess I'm not much of a gambler. I'll take a steady slow guarantee of progress over a jackpot just about every day. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/