"Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net> writes: > On Saturday, November 15, 2014 01:32:01 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Hi Kevin, >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@kernel.org> wrote: >> >>> It makes little sense to use generic power domains without runtime PM. >> >> >> >> Does it? >> >> It still powers down the PM domains on system suspend (at least on my >> >> boards ;-) >> > >> > Sure, but your devices are also using runtime PM, so I'm not sure how >> > does that change my statement above? >> >> I do mean with CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME turned off. >> >> If PM domain support is disabled, s2ram will not power down the PM domains. > > But if PM_RUNTIME is enabled along with it, I don't think it will make much > of a different, will it? > > Building the kernel with genpd and without PM_RUNTIME is possible today, > but is it really useful? To me, it only seems to make people try to > reinvent the wheel "because PM_RUNTIME may be unset". > > I have to say I'm seriously considering to make PM_SLEEP select > PM_RUNTIME too as that would make quite a few things a *lot* simpler.
Yes. If that were the case, we woudn't need the pm_runtime_force_* calls either. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/