From: Joern Engel <jo...@logfs.org>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit f4c24db1b7ad0ce84409e15744d26c6f86a96840 upstream.

The code is currently riddled with "drop the hardware_lock to avoid a
deadlock" bugs that expose races.  One of those races seems to expose a
valid warning in tcm_qla2xxx_clear_nacl_from_fcport_map.  Add some
bandaid to it.

Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <jo...@logfs.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
---
 drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c 
b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
index f85b9e5c1f05..80a1f9f40aac 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
@@ -740,7 +740,16 @@ static void tcm_qla2xxx_clear_nacl_from_fcport_map(struct 
qla_tgt_sess *sess)
        pr_debug("fc_rport domain: port_id 0x%06x\n", nacl->nport_id);
 
        node = btree_remove32(&lport->lport_fcport_map, nacl->nport_id);
-       WARN_ON(node && (node != se_nacl));
+       if (WARN_ON(node && (node != se_nacl))) {
+               /*
+                * The nacl no longer matches what we think it should be.
+                * Most likely a new dynamic acl has been added while
+                * someone dropped the hardware lock.  It clearly is a
+                * bug elsewhere, but this bit can't make things worse.
+                */
+               btree_insert32(&lport->lport_fcport_map, nacl->nport_id,
+                              node, GFP_ATOMIC);
+       }
 
        pr_debug("Removed from fcport_map: %p for WWNN: 0x%016LX, port_id: 
0x%06x\n",
            se_nacl, nacl->nport_wwnn, nacl->nport_id);
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to