On Wed 2014-11-19 10:49:56, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:02:04 +0100 > Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz> wrote: > > > On Fri 2014-11-14 23:59:05, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rost...@goodmis.org> > > > > > > Add a helper function seq_buf_used() that replaces the SEQ_BUF_USED() > > > private macro to let callers have a method to know how much of the > > > seq_buf was written to. > > > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011412.170377...@goodmis.org > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011413.321654...@goodmis.org > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> > > > --- > > > include/linux/seq_buf.h | 6 ++++++ > > > kernel/trace/seq_buf.c | 5 +---- > > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h > > > index 5d91262433e2..93718e570d4c 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h > > > @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ seq_buf_buffer_left(struct seq_buf *s) > > > return (s->size - 1) - s->len; > > > } > > > > > > +/* How much buffer was written? */ > > > +static inline unsigned int seq_buf_used(struct seq_buf *s) > > > +{ > > > + return min(s->len, s->size); > > > > To be precise, it should do > > > > return min(s->len, s->size - 1); > > > > at this stage and switch to the above code in ("[PATCH 21/26 v5] tracing: > > Have > > seq_buf use full buffer"). Well, it does not cause any big harm. Feel > > free to add: > > I actually thought about it, but realized that this only replaces the > original use of s->len, and we are only doing this to avoid buffer > overflows. If you get garbage, then so be it, as the original code > would give garbage too. Remember, some of the functions did have real > content in that last byte, even though it was considered "overflowed".
I thought that it was based on ftrace_seq code that had #define TRACE_SEQ_BUF_USED(s) min((s)->len, (unsigned int)(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) But you are right that the callers used s->len because the macro was local in trace_seq.c. Well, I think that it does not matter much. As you said, there might be a garbage a the end of the buffer. Callers used "len" directly. Also it will be min(s->len, s->size); after the commit "Have seq_buf use full buffer". Let's leave it as is. Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/