On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:29:24PM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 14:13, Dmitry Yusupov wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 13:54 -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Three years ago, there was no fully working open source distributed scm > > > code base to use as a starting point, so extending BK would have been the > > > only easy alternative. But since then the situation has changed. There > > > are now several working code bases to provide a good starting point: > > > Monotone, Arch, SVK, Bazaar-ng and others. > > > > Right. For example, SVK is pretty mature project and very close to 1.0 > > release now. And it supports all kind of merges including Cherry-Picking > > Mergeback: > > > > http://svk.elixus.org/?MergeFeatures > > So for an interim way to get the patch flow back online, SVK is ready to try > _now_, and we only need a way to import the version graph? (true/false)
Well, I followed some of the instructions to mirror the kernel tree on svn.clkao.org/linux/cvs, and although it took around 12 hours to import 28232 versions, I seem to have a mirror of it on my own subversion server now. I think the svn.clkao.org mirror was taken from bkcvs... the last log message I see is "Rev 28232 - torvalds - 2005-04-04 09:08:33" I have no idea what's missing. What is everyone's favorite web frontend to subversion? I've got websvn (debian package) on there now, and it's a bit sluggish, but it seems to work. I hope to have time this week or next to actually make this machine publicly accessible. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
