3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>

commit 9d28eb12447ee08bb5d1e8bb3195cf20e1ecd1c0 upstream.

The shrinker uses gfp flags to indicate what kind of operation can the
driver wait for. If __GFP_IO flag is present, the driver can wait for
block I/O operations, if __GFP_FS flag is present, the driver can wait on
operations involving the filesystem.

dm-bufio tested for __GFP_IO. However, dm-bufio can run on a loop block
device that makes calls into the filesystem. If __GFP_IO is present and
__GFP_FS isn't, dm-bufio could still block on filesystem operations if it
runs on a loop block device.

The change from __GFP_IO to __GFP_FS supposedly fixes one observed (though
unreproducible) deadlock involving dm-bufio and loop device.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snit...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -1448,9 +1448,9 @@ static void drop_buffers(struct dm_bufio
 
 /*
  * Test if the buffer is unused and too old, and commit it.
- * At if noio is set, we must not do any I/O because we hold
- * dm_bufio_clients_lock and we would risk deadlock if the I/O gets rerouted to
- * different bufio client.
+ * And if GFP_NOFS is used, we must not do any I/O because we hold
+ * dm_bufio_clients_lock and we would risk deadlock if the I/O gets
+ * rerouted to different bufio client.
  */
 static int __cleanup_old_buffer(struct dm_buffer *b, gfp_t gfp,
                                unsigned long max_jiffies)
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static int __cleanup_old_buffer(struct d
        if (jiffies - b->last_accessed < max_jiffies)
                return 0;
 
-       if (!(gfp & __GFP_IO)) {
+       if (!(gfp & __GFP_FS)) {
                if (test_bit(B_READING, &b->state) ||
                    test_bit(B_WRITING, &b->state) ||
                    test_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state))
@@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sh
        unsigned long freed;
 
        c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
-       if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)
+       if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
                dm_bufio_lock(c);
        else if (!dm_bufio_trylock(c))
                return SHRINK_STOP;
@@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ dm_bufio_shrink_count(struct shrinker *s
        unsigned long count;
 
        c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
-       if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)
+       if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
                dm_bufio_lock(c);
        else if (!dm_bufio_trylock(c))
                return 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to