From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rost...@goodmis.org>
The branch tracer should not be checking the trace_seq_printf() return value
as that will soon be void. There's a new trace_handle_return() helper function
that will return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE if the trace_seq overflowed
and TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_branch.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
index a3916f68a1c7..7d6e2afde669 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
@@ -151,14 +151,13 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_branch_print(struct
trace_iterator *iter,
trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
- if (trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "[%s] %s:%s:%d\n",
- field->correct ? " ok " : " MISS ",
- field->func,
- field->file,
- field->line))
- return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
-
- return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;
+ trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "[%s] %s:%s:%d\n",
+ field->correct ? " ok " : " MISS ",
+ field->func,
+ field->file,
+ field->line);
+
+ return trace_handle_return(&iter->seq);
}
static void branch_print_header(struct seq_file *s)
--
2.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
