On 20 November 2014 13:09 Dmitry Lavnikevich wrote:

> > On 20Nov, 2014, at 12:23, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > On 20 November 2014 09:55 Dmitry Lavnikevich wrote:
> >
> >> Call platform_get_irq_byname() returns local IRQ number. Use
> >> regmap_irq_get_virq() to get VIRQ instead.
> >> This fixes rtc initialization error:
> >> da9063-rtc da9063-rtc: Failed to request ALARM IRQ 1: -22
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Lavnikevich <d.lavnikev...@sam-solutions.com>
> >
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > Please refer to the previous patch :
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/329051/
> 
> Yes, I’ve seen this patch for da9055.
> I have no hardware with da9055 to test it but as I understood from
> da9055-core.c sources the difference is in regmap_add_irq_chip()
> call. Looks like passing irq_base = -1 to it dynamically allocates
> irq_base so call regmap_irq_chip_get_base() then returns base for
> virtual IRQ.

Hi Dmitry,
-- that is what I expect ... mmm..

[...]
> >
> > da9063-rtc da9063-rtc: Failed to request ALARM IRQ -22: -22
> > da9063-rtc: probe of da9063-rtc failed with error -22
> 
> I have tested this patch on pfla02 board and it was ok. On which
> board this fail occurred?

I am using a MCIMX6DL-SDP board -- although I the differences are in
my code base and not the platform in this case.
My apologies 

Regards,
Steve

patch follows:

=== DIFF of drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c ... linux-next/v3.18-rc5 
870,880c870,877
<       regulators->irq_ldo_lim = regmap_irq_get_virq(da9063->regmap_irq, irq);
<       if (regulators->irq_ldo_lim >= 0) {
<               ret = request_threaded_irq(regulators->irq_ldo_lim,
<                                          NULL, da9063_ldo_lim_event,
<                                          IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
<                                          "LDO_LIM", regulators);
<               if (ret) {
<                       dev_err(&pdev->dev,
<                                       "Failed to request LDO_LIM IRQ.\n");
<                       regulators->irq_ldo_lim = -ENXIO;
<               }
---
>       ret = request_threaded_irq(irq,
>                                  NULL, da9063_ldo_lim_event,
>                                  IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>                                  "LDO_LIM", regulators);
>       if (ret) {
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>                               "Failed to request LDO_LIM IRQ.\n");
>               regulators->irq_ldo_lim = -ENXIO;
=== DIFF of drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c ... linux-next/v3.18-rc5 <> InSparse
121c121
<               da9063->irq_base = 0;
---
>               da9063->irq_base = -1;
170a171,172
>       da9063->irq_base = regmap_irq_chip_get_base(da9063->regmap_irq);
>

N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Reply via email to