On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:46:31AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:36:02 +0200 > , Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com> > wrote: > > Dynamically inserting i2c client device nodes requires the use > > of a single device registration method. Rework and export it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com> > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> > > Wolfram, this patch and the next one only make sense in conjunction with the > overlay > patches, but they don't necessarily need to be merged via the same tree. > I'm happy to take them, but am equally happy to have you take them > (assuming I ack the next patch; I haven't looked at it yet). What is > your preference?
OK, now I had the time to look at it, phew. Is this targetted for 3.19? Then you can take it: Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> There is a minor conflict caused by this patch in i2c/for-next which should be easy to solve, just remove the irq handling. 2fd36c552649 2014-10-30 15:59 Laurent Pinchart o i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time If you target for later than 3.19, then we need to discuss again, because there might be other i2c core changes coming in.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature