Am 24.11.2014 um 21:29 schrieb Alexei Starovoitov:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Christian Borntraeger
> <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone with a new propopal? ;-) ^
>
> one more proposal :)
> #define __ACCESS_ONCE(x) ({ typeof(x) __var = 0; (volatile typeof(x) *)&(x);
> })
> #define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*__ACCESS_ONCE(x))
This seems to work. I only had to add an __always_unused to __var.
>
> works as lvalue...
> the basic idea is the same:
> constant zero can be used to initialize any scalar
> (including pointers), but unions and structs will fail to compile as:
> "error: invalid initializer"
>
> If I'm reading pr58145 gcc bug report correctly, it
> miscompiles only structs, so we can let ACCESS_ONCE
> to work on unions. Then the following will rejects structs only:
> #define __ACCESS_ONCE(x) ({ (typeof(x))0; (volatile typeof(x) *)&(x); })
> #define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*__ACCESS_ONCE(x))
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
