On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:

> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:37:45 -0700
> From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Steven French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cifs: md5 cleanup - functions
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:11:39PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > 
> > Function names and return types on same line - conform to established 
> > fs/cifs/ style.
> > 
> > Patch is also available at:
> >     http://www.linuxtux.org/~juhl/kernel_patches/fs_cifs_md5-funct.patch
> 
> I think the right thing to do here is what I did with the SHA1 code
> from random.c: put the favorite implementation in lib/ and replace the
> cryptoapi and CIFS implementations (and any other users) with it.
> 
> If you feel like tackling this, let me know, it's been on my todo list
> for a while.
> 
I wouldn't mind having a go at it, but I don't have too much time this 
week, but next week I should have some time - I'll take a look at it then.

-- 
Jesper Juhl


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to