On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure that this is something GCC will warn you about in the
> compilation stage.

It does? I've never seen it, but maybe it's a new thing.

The gcc signedness warnings have historically been so wretched that
it's just sad, and they have to be turned off.

> kernel/time/ntp.c:process_adjtimex_modes():
>
>         if (txc->modes & ADJ_FREQUENCY) {
>                 time_freq = txc->freq * PPM_SCALE;   <=== Undefined overflow
>                 time_freq = min(time_freq, MAXFREQ_SCALED);
>                 time_freq = max(time_freq, -MAXFREQ_SCALED);
>                 /* update pps_freq */
>                 pps_set_freq(time_freq);
>         }
>
> The multiplication is between signed integers, and it overflows (user 
> triggerable).

Well, we check that the end result - overflowed or not - is in a sane
range. So this might fall under the heading of "user gets what he asks
for".

                         Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to