On Thursday 27 November 2014 16:34:58 Chanwoo Choi wrote: > + > +/* > + * Samsung pinctrl driver data for Exynos5433 SoC. Exynos5433 SoC includes > + * four gpio/pin-mux/pinconfig controllers. > + */ > +struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5433_pin_ctrl[] = { > + { > + /* pin-controller instance 0 data */ > + .pin_banks = exynos5433_pin_banks0, > + .nr_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5433_pin_banks0), > + .eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init, > + .suspend = exynos_pinctrl_suspend, > + .resume = exynos_pinctrl_resume, > + .label = "exynos5433-gpio-ctrl0", > + }, { >
I'm counting nine controllers, not four ;-) These seem to all be fairly regular, my impression is that with the move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings for each future SoC that uses the same scheme. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/