On Thursday 27 November 2014 16:34:58 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> +
> +/*
> + * Samsung pinctrl driver data for Exynos5433 SoC. Exynos5433 SoC includes
> + * four gpio/pin-mux/pinconfig controllers.
> + */
> +struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5433_pin_ctrl[] = {
> +       {
> +               /* pin-controller instance 0 data */
> +               .pin_banks      = exynos5433_pin_banks0,
> +               .nr_banks       = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5433_pin_banks0),
> +               .eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init,
> +               .suspend        = exynos_pinctrl_suspend,
> +               .resume         = exynos_pinctrl_resume,
> +               .label          = "exynos5433-gpio-ctrl0",
> +       }, {
> 

I'm counting nine controllers, not four ;-)

These seem to all be fairly regular, my impression is that with the
move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully
describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings
for each future SoC that uses the same scheme.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to