On 11/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 11/27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So I think the patch below makes sense anyway. Although I should probably
> > split it and remove PT_TRACE_EXIT in 2/2.
>
> So let me send the patches.
>
> David, Michal, could you review and ack/nack these changes explicitly?
>
> Let me repeat once again that this patch doesn't pretend to solve
> all problems, even with the coredumping. And I have to admit that
> my main motivation is 2/2, this PT_TRACE_EXIT check annoys me ;)

Another simple test. cat mtsleep.c:

        #include <unistd.h>
        #include <pthread.h>

        void *tfunc(void *arg)
        {
                pause();
                return NULL;
        }

        int main(void)
        {
                pthread_t th;

                pthread_create(&th, NULL, tfunc, NULL);
                pause();

                return 0;
        }

Now,

        # echo '|/bin/sleep 1000' >> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
        # echo 10 >> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pipe_limit

        # ./mtsleep &
        # kill -QUIT %1
        # perl -e 'push @_,"x" x 1000_1000 while 1'

Before this series the system hangs and doesn't respond. With these
patches it correctly kills perl.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to