>> Which names would be better acceptable for you? > > You named it after the goto location but the label name should be based > on the label location to say what the goto does.
I find it easier occasionally to name a label similarly to the jump target. It seems that there are a few variations used for the affected identifiers. > Something like "err_put_fsinfo", "err_put_fat", and "err_unload" or like that. How do you think about to provide a patch with your preferred names if my chances are lower to suggest the pleasing ones directly in my first tries? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
