On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:57:25 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:52:11 -0800 > Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > > > yeah. teaching tree walk to do (state & 2048) == 0 is not trivial, > > since it doesn't have a concept of value of expression. > > Doing !(state & 2048) is probably a bit easier, since there > > are hacks for 'not' already. > > That's exactly what I was looking at doing. If I can get something > working without spending more than an hour or two, I may even push it > for this release cycle. Clarification; When I said "release cycle", I meant the next merge window. Not for 3.18. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
