Hi Linus,
Noted, while I continue to work on this IRQ feature, can I resend patch 1 and 
patch 2 (rebase to devel branch) in v5 thread so that you can pull them in 
first? 

Regards,
Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.wall...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 28 November, 2014 10:03 PM
> To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; GPIO Subsystem Mailing List; Westerberg, Mika;
> Denis Turischev; Alexandre Courbot
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] gpio: sch: Enable IRQ support for Quark X1000
> 
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
> <rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > ntel Quark X1000 GPIO controller supports interrupt handling for both
> > core power well and resume power well. This patch is to enable the IRQ
> > support and provide IRQ handling for Intel Quark X1000 GPIO-SCH device
> > driver.
> >
> > This piece of work is derived from Dan O'Donovan's initial work for
> > Quark X1000 enabling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
> > <rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com>
> 
> This is just adding handling of cascading interrupts from a GPIO chip as far 
> as I
> can tell. We don't do that with local per-driver hacks anymore if there is no
> special reason, we have helpers on gpiolib to handle this.
> 
> Make your Kconfig select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP and take it from there, look at how
> other drivers using GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP are done. Read the documentation for
> chained irqchips in Documentation/gpio/driver.txt
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Reply via email to