I am doing network performance test under suse11sp3 and intel 82599 nic,
Becasuse the softirq is out of schedule policy's control, so netserver
thread couldn't always get 100% cpu usage, then packet dropped in kernel
udp socket's receive queue.
In order to get a stable result, I did some patch in ixgbe driver and
then use irq_thread instead of softirq to handle rx.
It seems work well, but irq_thread's SCHED_FIFO schedule policy cause
that when the cpu is limited, netserver couldn't work at all.
So I change the irq_thread's schedule policy from SCHED_FIFO to
SCHED_NORMAL, then the irq_thread could share the cpu usage with
netserver thread.
the question is:
What's the concrete reason about setting irq thread's policy as SCHED_FIFO?
Except the priority affecting the cpu usage, any function would be
broken if irq thread change to SCHED_NORMAL?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
