>> Which name pattern do you find more appropriate in such >> an use case? > > I think Dan wants the label to be descriptive about the tasks > needed in the exception handling itself.
I would usually prefer also such a target-oriented labelling for the affected identifiers. How are the chances to express an expectation in this direction unambiguously for the proposed coding style update? > This makes sense as the exception handling steps may be reused > for different failures in the code. I would stress a different reason from my point of view. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
