Hi Paolo,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:57:10PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>This is the size of the XSAVES area. This starts providing guest support
>for XSAVES (with no support yet for supervisor states, i.e. XSS == 0
>always in guests for now).
>
>Wanpeng Li suggested testing XSAVEC as well as XSAVES, since in practice
>no real processor exists that only has one of them, and there is no
>other way for userspace programs to compute the area of the XSAVEC
>save area. CPUID(EAX=0xd,ECX=1).EBX provides an upper bound.
>
>Suggested-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
>Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@linux.intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>index e24df01ab118..2f7bc2de9915 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> #include "mmu.h"
> #include "trace.h"
>
>-static u32 xstate_required_size(u64 xstate_bv)
>+static u32 xstate_required_size(u64 xstate_bv, bool compacted)
> {
> int feature_bit = 0;
> u32 ret = XSAVE_HDR_SIZE + XSAVE_HDR_OFFSET;
>@@ -31,9 +31,10 @@ static u32 xstate_required_size(u64 xstate_bv)
> xstate_bv &= XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK;
> while (xstate_bv) {
> if (xstate_bv & 0x1) {
>- u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>+ u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx, offset;
> cpuid_count(0xD, feature_bit, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>- ret = max(ret, eax + ebx);
>+ offset = compacted ? ret : ebx;
>+ ret = max(ret, offset + eax);
> }
>
> xstate_bv >>= 1;
>@@ -87,9 +88,13 @@ int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> (best->eax | ((u64)best->edx << 32)) &
> kvm_supported_xcr0();
> vcpu->arch.guest_xstate_size = best->ebx =
>- xstate_required_size(vcpu->arch.xcr0);
>+ xstate_required_size(vcpu->arch.xcr0, false);
> }
>
>+ best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0xD, 1);
>+ if (best && (best->eax & (F(XSAVES)|F(XSAVEC))))
>+ best->ebx = xstate_required_size(vcpu->arch.xcr0, true);
>+
> /*
> * The existing code assumes virtual address is 48-bit in the canonical
> * address checks; exit if it is ever changed.
>@@ -470,9 +475,14 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2
>*entry, u32 function,
> goto out;
>
> do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[i], function, idx);
>- if (idx == 1)
When if (idx == 1) is added in this patchset? I suspect that you miss
to add your patch "kvm: x86: mask out XSAVES" in this patchset.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>+ if (idx == 1) {
> entry[i].eax &=
> kvm_supported_word10_x86_features;
>- else if (entry[i].eax == 0 || !(supported & mask))
>+ entry[i].ebx = 0;
>+ if (entry[i].eax & (F(XSAVES)|F(XSAVEC)))
>+ entry[i].ebx =
>+ xstate_required_size(supported,
>+ true);
>+ } else if (entry[i].eax == 0 || !(supported & mask))
> continue;
> entry[i].flags |=
> KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
>--
>1.8.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
