On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:35:49PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > Hi Jarkko, > > > >is it cool if I prepare a separate set of fixes for all issues > >in v9? I do not see any problem that could not be fixed without > >major structural changes. > > > > to be honest - I would prefer a v10 with the fixes included, > especially since there were quite a few issues/remarks. > If you already have fixes post them as patches on top of v9 so we > can test, and then squash them in.
It's as easy for me to just prepare a new patch set. > I think we are still in schedule if you do fixes over the weekend > - so we hopefully have a _great_ v10 on monday/tuesday Yeah, I apologize for the state of v9. I admit that I rushed with it a bit. I'll prepare a new patch set over the weekend. > I'll send out the first pull request without TPM2.0 support later > this evening, > and then send out another one by next week - this should be fine. Great! > The next testing slot is Sunday evening since I'm travelling > myself (and don't have TPM hardware with me). > > > Thanks, > Peter /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
