OK, thanks. I shall try to send another patch to upstream kernel within this month.
Send from Lenovo A788t. Michal Hocko <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, >this has been fixed last week already >http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=141751847710864&w=2 > >On Sat 06-12-14 06:27:57, Chen Gang wrote: >> test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable() is only used when "MAX_NUMNODES > 1", >> so move it into related quote. >> >> The related warning (with allmodconfig under parisc): >> >> CC mm/memcontrol.o >> mm/memcontrol.c:1629:13: warning: 'test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable' >> defined but not used [-Wunused-function] >> static bool test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, >> ^ >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <[email protected]> >> --- >> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c >> index c6ac50e..d538b08 100644 >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c >> @@ -1616,6 +1616,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup >> *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, >> NULL, "Memory cgroup out of memory"); >> } >> >> +#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1 >> /** >> * test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable >> * @memcg: the target memcg >> @@ -1638,7 +1639,6 @@ static bool test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(struct >> mem_cgroup *memcg, >> return false; >> >> } >> -#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1 >> >> /* >> * Always updating the nodemask is not very good - even if we have an empty >> -- >> 1.9.3 > >-- >Michal Hocko >SUSE Labs N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a��� 0��h���i
