Hi Lee, > On Thu, 04 Dec 2014, Lee Jones wrote: > > > ST's Common Clk Framework is now available. This patch ensures the FSM > > makes use of it by obtaining and enabling the EMI clock if provided. If > > system fails to provide the EMI clock FSM uses its original default > > rate. > > <snip> > > I'm not sure I understand this patch. Now that common clock framework > is available for STI platforms, why would the emi clock ever not be available? > > If it is to maintain DT compatability then we are already breaking this with > the > syscfg 'reg' DT changes which are coming up, and this was deemed OK as the > platform > is WIP. > > IMO keeping this legacy code which assumes the bootloader / JTAG has enabled > and configured > the emi clock correctly is not worth it now that CCF is available for the > platform.
Also this legacy code will definately break when we we stop booting the kernel with "clk_ignore_unused" parameter. regards, Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
