From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:58:50 +0200

> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:02:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> David, assuming patches are acceptable, I'd like them all to be merged 
>> through
>> virtio or vhost trees to avoid dependency headaches.  Could you please ack
>> doing that for net related patches, especially these:
>>        tun: move internal flag defines out of uapi
>>        tun: drop most type defines
>>        tun: add VNET_LE flag
>>        tun: TUN_VNET_LE support, fix sparse warnings for virtio headers
>>        macvtap: TUN_VNET_HDR support
>>        vhost/scsi: partial virtio 1.0 support
>>        af_packet: virtio 1.0 stubs
>> Alternatively, I can prepare a tree with virtio changes and merge
>> that into your net-next - if Rusty approves, or keeps
>> silence :)
> 
> David, Rusty - ping.
> Are both of you ok withmerging this through the vhost tree?

No objections on my side.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to