On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:17:14PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Seem like this issue is not specific to the da9052 regulator.
> On a imx6q-wandboard we can see the internal anatop regulators being > probed on linux-next 20141031: > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141031/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html > > [ 0.072014] vdd1p1: 800 <--> 1375 mV at 1100 mV > [ 0.073027] vdd3p0: 2800 <--> 3150 mV at 3000 mV > [ 0.073933] vdd2p5: 2000 <--> 2750 mV at 2400 mV > [ 0.074888] vddarm: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV > [ 0.075935] vddpu: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV > [ 0.076897] vddsoc: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1200 mV > ,but since next-20141103 they do not probe anymore: > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141103/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html That last log looks *extremely* unhappy in general, I can't actually see any references to attempts to do regulator things and there's lots of backtraces in there. AFAICT those regulators are anatop regulators and I can't find references to that driver or anything called "vdd".
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
