On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 21:11 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 03:37:07 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Since both ppc and ppc64 have LE variants which are now reported by uname, > > add that flag (__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) to syscall_get_arch() and add > > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE variant. > > > > Without this, perf trace and auditctl fail. > > > > Mainline kernel reports ppc64le (per a058801) but there is no matching > > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE. > > > > Since 32-bit PPC LE is not supported by audit, don't advertise it in > > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC* variants. > > > > See: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00082.html > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-December/msg00004.html > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 +++++- > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > The audit changes look fine to me, but as I mentioned earlier, this should go > in via the ppc tree and not the audit tree. > > Acked-by: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com>
Thanks. Yep I'll take it via the powerpc tree, I'll CC stable as well as presumably we want this to work in all versions that had LE support. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
