On 12/10/2014 11:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Why would I want to enable this in my kernel when there are no actual
> CPU's out yet that support it? And even when there are, why would I do
> it if the CPU I have doesn't support it?
For folks that build their own kernels and know what CPU they have,
you'd never want to enable it other than compile testing (or maybe some
basic runtime testing to make sure we didn't mess up the #BR code on
CPUs without the feature).
But, this is the kind of option that we want to be *sure* is enabled
unless folks know exactly what they are doing, so we should probably
hide it behind CONFIG_EXPERT as well, just as SMEP is.
We might be getting to the point where we need to bury all these
Intel-specific options somewhere, but that's a patch for another day.
Patch is attached to convert it over to this:
config X86_INTEL_MPX
prompt "Intel MPX (Memory Protection Extensions)" if EXPERT
def_bool y
depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
---help---
MPX provides hardware features that can be used in
conjunction with compiler-instrumented code to check
memory references. It is designed to detect buffer
overflow or underflow bugs.
Enabling this option will make the kernel larger and
slightly increase the size of some data structures.
If unsure, say Y.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
