On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >> -       struct resource r = {
> >> -               .flags = 0
> >> -       };
> >> +       struct resource r;
> >>
> >> +       memset(&r, 0, sizeof(r));
> >
> > What's the point of this change? Both initialize r to 0. memset()
> > generates better code, but that's irrelevant for the problem at hand.
> 
> late there is
> 
> info->res[info->res_num] = r;
> 
> don't want the random pointer in r get copied.

Did you actually read what I wrote?

        struct resource r = {
               .flags = 0
        };

initializes r completely to 0. So how do you get a random pointer in r?

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to