On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > >> - struct resource r = { > >> - .flags = 0 > >> - }; > >> + struct resource r; > >> > >> + memset(&r, 0, sizeof(r)); > > > > What's the point of this change? Both initialize r to 0. memset() > > generates better code, but that's irrelevant for the problem at hand. > > late there is > > info->res[info->res_num] = r; > > don't want the random pointer in r get copied.
Did you actually read what I wrote? struct resource r = { .flags = 0 }; initializes r completely to 0. So how do you get a random pointer in r? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/