The array tps_comparators starts at zero,
yet COMP1 starts at 1. So COMP2 is out of bounds.

cppcheck reported:
[drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c:61]: (error) Array 'tps_comparators[2]' 
accessed at index 2, which is out of bounds.
[drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c:88]: (error) Array 'tps_comparators[2]' 
accessed at index 2, which is out of bounds.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jaro...@intra2net.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c 
b/drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c
index c0816eb..e8c2e32 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65911-comparator.c
@@ -58,13 +58,14 @@ static struct comparator tps_comparators[] = {
 
 static int comp_threshold_set(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int id, int voltage)
 {
-       struct comparator tps_comp = tps_comparators[id];
+       struct comparator tps_comp;
        int curr_voltage = 0;
        int ret;
        u8 index = 0, val;
 
-       if (id == COMP)
+       if (id == COMP || id > COMP2)
                return 0;
+       tps_comp = tps_comparators[id-1];
 
        while (curr_voltage < tps_comp.uV_max) {
                curr_voltage = tps_comp.vsel_table[index];
@@ -85,12 +86,13 @@ static int comp_threshold_set(struct tps65910 *tps65910, 
int id, int voltage)
 
 static int comp_threshold_get(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int id)
 {
-       struct comparator tps_comp = tps_comparators[id];
+       struct comparator tps_comp;
        int ret;
        u8 val;
 
-       if (id == COMP)
+       if (id == COMP || id > COMP2)
                return 0;
+       tps_comp = tps_comparators[id-1];
 
        ret = tps65910->read(tps65910, tps_comp.reg, 1, &val);
        if (ret < 0)
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to